Target DC

Use the state drop down menu and review the voting record chart of your representatives in Congress. The information table will point out the new members of Congress, show which Senators are up for election or retiring in 2012, how many terms and years all members of Congress have served, and most importantly, how they have voted on specific legislation that was extremely detrimental to our liberties and well-being. A "Yes" in the column for the following subjects is contrary to the best interests of the country. The mark "---" denotes that the member was not in office at the time of the vote.

The legislation selected for review consists of:

The Barney Frank Stimulus bill of January 2009 (TARP Reform and Accountability Act) that gave government control of and bailed out Wall Street and the automobile manufacturers
The Waxman-Markey Cap and Trade legislation (The American Clean Energy and Security Act) that will increase the cost and reduce the supply of energy and weaken the security of this nation
Both the Stimulus bill and the Cap-and-Trade legislation were written in the backrooms of congress and pushed through a partisan floor vote without being read or debated. A "Yes" vote on either bill is an admission of irresponsible voting for it is tantamount to being negligent at best—for how can anyone vote for such sweeping and voluminous legislation without even reading it?
The McCain-Kennedy Comprehensive Immigration Reform bill, the D.R.E.A.M. Act, and other amnesty-oriented legislation of 2007 were all greatly visible to the public and warranted the overwhelming opposition that the voters expressed. Any member of congress who voted for these legislative proposals was either naive or pandering to special interest groups at the expense of American liberty and sovereignty.

Since each of these four issues is individually dangerous to our liberties, a "Yes" for just one of them justifies the removal from congress of that representative.

Further, you will note in the chart that any member of Congress who has served over 15 years is to be reviewed for removal from congress even if they correctly voted against all of the bills. This is due to the fact that they have had more than sufficient time when they were in the majority to prevent or solve the financial, energy, and immigration problems that have continued to the present. Therefore, in the performance of their responsibilities, they have either been unable, unwilling, or incompetent to do their job. Thus, it may well be time for them to be replaced with new blood that will solve these problems and implement the will of the people when given the opportunity to do so.